On Demographic and Democratic Transitions
نویسنده
چکیده
this essay considers the implications of the demographic transition for the emergence of modern democracy. although the idea of representative democracy was present in europe and north america in the late eighteenth century, here i am concerned with its realization—and this occurs much later. i argue that consideration of the demographic transition in western countries sheds light on what is sometimes called the “democratic transition.” indeed, i believe that few aspects of socioeconomic development were more closely associated with the appearance of democracy than was progress with respect to the demographic transition. the relationship between the demographic and democratic transitions has been largely overlooked. one recalls Paul demeny’s still highly apposite observation—made in a paper now almost half a century old—regarding the extraordinary degree of neglect, shown by historians and other social scientists, of the consequences of the demographic transition. also germane are his remark that study of history can provide valuable insight into forces that are still at work, and his reflection on the non-autochthonous character of many of the development processes that are affecting developing countries (see demeny 1968: 502–504). after providing background on previous research, the essay 1) discusses why a population’s progress through the demographic transition might be expected to promote a movement to democratic politics; 2) considers issues of measurement in relation to both the demographic transition and democracy; 3) examines the emergence of democracy with particular reference to europe; and 4) appraises the potential relevance of my argument to contemporary international conditions.
منابع مشابه
Comparative Study of How the Type of Civil Society May Influence the Type of Transition in Revolutions of Tunisia, Egypt and Libya
General views have usually ignored the relation between the type of civil society and the type of political transitions. To address this shortcoming, the current article has reinvestigated this relation through a comparative study of revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya. In the framework of this relation, this article has demonstrated that remarkable development of civil society in Tunisia a...
متن کاملInequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
Recent work by Carles Boix and Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson has focused on the role of inequality and distributive conflict in transitions to and from democratic rule. We assess these claims through causal process observation, using an original qualitative dataset on democratic transitions and reversions during the “third wave” from 1980 to 2000. We show that distributive conflict, a key c...
متن کاملTracing Channels of Influence on Democratic Transitions and Consolidation
How does aid impact democracy in sub-Saharan Africa? Drawing on existing literature, this study elaborates on the various channels, direct and indirect, through which development and democracy aid has influenced transitions to multi-party regimes and democratic consolidation within the region. The study’s findings are at least threefold. First, development aid was effective at promoting democra...
متن کاملA Duration Analysis of Democratic Transitions and Authoritarian Backslides
Recent theories of political development have emphasized redistributive demands as the main drivers of democratic transitions and consolidation. The authors employ Cox duration models to evaluate a number of economic, institutionalist, and sociological theories of regime transition, using global data from 1970 to 1999. This study suggests that demands for redistribution are insufficient explana...
متن کامل